Skip to main content

The Real Interpretations That Hindus Follow. Svetasvatara Upanishad (Sv.4.20)



The Real Interpretations That Hindus Follow.
Svetasvatara Upanishad (Sv.4.20)

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/
pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307", enable_page_level_ads: true });</script>

The composer of Svetasvatara Upanishad, Sage Svetasvatara realized the Brahman. The realization is reality beyond what we see through physical eyes. Eyes can cheat.

“Sv.6.21   -  Through the power of austerity and through the grace of the Lord, the sage Svetasvatara realised Brahman and proclaimed the highly sacred Knowledge, supremely cherished by the company of seers, to sannyasins of the most advanced stage.”

The misinterpreted meaning by some innocent children of God on  Sv. 4.20

They always claim, no one sees Him / Brahman with the eyes (because God / Brahman has no image according to their belief. I respect their belief), but the actual mantra continues, one can see God through the inner eyes (manakkan). These innocent children of God hid/misquote the other parts of mantras. And never read through the whole Svetasvatara Upanishad.

The verse Sv.4.20 partly quoted,
“Na samdrse tisthati rupam asya, na caksusa pasyati kas canainam”
Their translations.
"His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye."

So, they claim God has no image. It is their view. ( I respect their view.) Nowhere in any of the Hindu scriptures, mentioned that Brahman cannot or will not take form/avatar.

The actual mantra from Svetasvatara Upanishad.

/ na saṃdṛśe tiṣṭhati rūpam asya na cakṣuṣā paśyati kaścanainaṃ /
// hṛdā hṛdisthaṃ manasā ya enam evaṃ vidur amṛtās te bhavanti //  (SV.4.20 )

Actual translations.
His form is not an object of vision; no one beholds Him with the eyes. (physical eyes)
They who, through pure intellect and the Knowledge of Unity (meditation / inner eyes / manasic dhristi) based upon reflection, realize Him as abiding in the heart become immortal. (union with Brahman)

The summary of Interpretations.

The form of Brahman cannot appear before naked eyes. Nobody can visualize Him physically. But those who experience Him through meditation have seen Him through inner eyes, become immortal, reach moksha. The sages have seen the images of Brahman in a different manifestation, thus the image has been reflected in the form /shape of Murthy / idol in temples. In fact, every individual Atma has its own manifestation of the Brahman or its attributions.

These two verses below from the same scripture proves that we can see/know the Brahman and the manifestations or attributes through meditations / Nidra yoga (dhyana Nidra)

“Sv.2.11     When yoga is practiced, the forms which appear first and which gradually manifest Brahman are those or snow-flakes, smoke, sun, wind, fire, fireflies, lightning, crystal (thousands sparkling diamonds /arutperunjothi within / microcosm  or the nebula/galaxies/universe outer/macrocosm) and the moon.”

“Sv.2.15     And when the yogi beholds the real nature of Brahman, through the Knowledge of the Self, radiant as a lamp, then, having known the unborn and immutable Lord, who is untouched by ignorance and its effects, he is freed from all fetters.”
Besides that, we believe Brahman will descent to earth from time to time as avatara of Brahman to uphold dharma. (Mentioned in many scriptures including Bhagavad Gita.)

The mantra below from the same scripture says, Brahman,”  ….born as a child and He will born again in the future…”, shows the coming of avatars. Avataras has an image, pictures, names, family, and so on.

“Sv.2.16     He indeed, the Lord, who pervades all regions, was the first to be born and it is He who dwells in the womb of the universe. It is He, again, who is born as a child and He will be born in the future, He stands behind all persons and His face is everywhere.”

Besides this scripture, there are many other Hindu scriptures describe the image and avatar of Brahman. So Hindus are always following the basic foundation of Vedas.

Sourced from Svetasvatara Upanishad translated by Adi Shankara. My salutations to Adi Shankaracharya and  Swami Guhabhaktananda.

Summarized by Sri Sivasiddhi.
Verified by Swami Brahmananda. Dhyana Ashram, Kulim,Kedah, Malaysia
(President of Mahaasabhah)

Sri Sivasiddhi
19 August 2017
Om Namah Shivaya.
@Sivasiddhispeaks
Sivasiddhi Speaks in FB.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shiva Linga Dan Konsep Tuhan

Shiva Linga Dan Konsep Tuhan.  Dalam Konteks Hindu. Simbol /Linga (Sanskrit    लिङ्ग ) Linga ialah SIMBOL sempurna mewakili Tuhan Mahaesa (Veda-Parabrahman, Mazhab Siva- Mahesan) yang tiada rupa hanya satu. Perkataan Linga ialah ganbungan daripada perkataan LING + GA, Ling bermaksud dissolusi/ mahapralaya /kiamat, manakala Ga bermaksud penciptaan (creation), maka maksud sebenar ialah Tuhan maha berkuasa yang melakukan tugas penciptaan dan disolusi, Setiap benda datang daripadaNya dan akan kembali kepadaNya. Mahadeva Siva merupakan tonggak utama untuk mencapai Moksha (Mazhab Siva). Linga juga mewakili Trimurti utama (Rudra/ Siva, Vishnu dan Brahma). Kitab Rujukan Autoriti untuk Mazhab Siva. Rujukan utama  seharusnya daripada 4 Veda dan 28 Saiva Agama yang diturunkan sendiri oleh Mahadeva Siva, Maka sebarang klaim seharusnya daripada Veda atau Agama. Disamping ada 18 Mahapurana termasuk Siva Purana, Linga Purana dll. Namun Purana bukan autoriti rujukan dan ia lebih kepada sejarah la

Sembah Patung? Agama Apa Itu?

Sembah Patung? Ada orang ingat atau andaikan bahawa orang Hindu  sembah patung (berhala) kerana dia NAMPAK  orang Hindu sembah di hadapan patung tanpa sedar atau memahami hakikat sebenar.  Persoalan,  Saya juga LIHAT  ada orang sembah dihadapan bangunan, ADAKAH ORANG ITU SEMBAH BANGUNAN ITU? TENTUNYA TIDAK.  Kerana saya sebagai seorang Hindu ada kewarasan minda untuk memahami kebenaran TUHAN dan memahami konsep Tuhan dalam keadaan Nirguna dan Sarguna.  Tetapi ada orang yang DANGKAL ilmu ingat orang Hindu sembah batu. Perlu diingatkan disini, ORANG ITU PERNAH MENGAKU SEMBAH BATU MASA KECIL KERANA KEBODOHAN SENDIRI. MALANGNYA MASIH KEKAL BODOH walaupun mendabik sudah jadi pandai.  <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication. com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({  google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",  enable_page_level_ads: true }); Orang Hindu sembah Tuhan dal

Arulattam/Trance and Saiva Siddhantam

 Arulattam/ Trance and Saiva Siddhantam Meaning of Trance Trance is actually when a bhakta reaches the height of Bhakti (paravasam), after went through vratham, pujas, meditations, etc., the mind is fully engrossed with the deity one prays,  the atma will be connected with the Paramporul within one’s body. The maya veil is removed for a moment, thus the sparks of the ‘projected’/believed deity/paramporul will manifest in the physical body of the person. (The deity projected is based to past karmic account actually). That is the reason one in trance will cry, yell, dance, etc because the joy of the temporary union with the deity. The ‘projected’/believed appearance is based on what deity one prays. If one projected Kaliaman, the Kaliamman will manifest, if Muneeswarar then Muneeswarar will be manifested. Most bhaktas don’t go for Murugan, Sivan or Ganapathy because it is considered difficult or seen as a higher deity. But if one really projected, these deities also will manifest (karmic