Every Hindu Should Know:The Truth as it Is

Thaipusam and Milk Abishegam <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307", enable_page_level_ads: true }); </script> This article is to enlighten many of us including the Anaryas (the non-Hindus). Pouring milk (abhiseka) on the statue (Vigraha) by devotees during Thaipusam is questioned by some Anaryas (non-Hindus), assumed it was a waste, even some prominent figure among Indians in Malaysia had doubts. Some said that doing abhisheka ( is good but it turns bad because the milk is not drunk by the devotees, it is wasted and it is sin. So no benefit. For their information, Nobody pours the milk into the drain to call it waste!  Abishegam is the agamic ritual practiced in temples for deity (statue) from the day temples were built (Shilpi Shas

The Real Interpretations That Hindus Follow. Yajur Veda (Y.40.9) <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <!-- sivasiddhi1082_main_Blog1_1x1_as --> <ins class="adsbygoogle"      style="display:block"      data-ad-client="ca-pub-2960278825814307"      data-ad-slot="9143843878"      data-ad-format="auto"      data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins> <script>      (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); </script> ( Versi Bahasa Malaysia di bawah) Tafsiran Sebenar Yang Orang Hindu Amalkan. Kitab Yajur Veda.(Y.40.9) Some innocent children of God (Zakir and his so-called students) try to interpret their own meaning about Hinduism. Their interpretations were not much different from Salman Rushdie's' interpretations on Muslim scripture , interpret with own meaning. The interpretation was wron

The Real Interpretations That Hindus Follow. Svetasvatara Upanishad (Sv.4.20) <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/ pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307", enable_page_level_ads: true });</script> The composer of Svetasvatara Upanishad, Sage Svetasvatara realized the Brahman. The realization is reality beyond what we see through physical eyes. Eyes can cheat. “Sv.6.21   -  Through the power of austerity and through the grace of the Lord, the sage Svetasvatara realised Brahman and proclaimed the highly sacred Knowledge, supremely cherished by the company of seers, to sannyasins of the most advanced stage.” The misinterpreted meaning by some innocent children of God on  Sv. 4.20 They always claim, no one sees Him / Brahman with the eyes (because God / Brahman has no image according to their beli

Lesson from Ekalavya to be Learned. The misconception is that  Dronacharya asked the right thumb of Ekalavya because he belonged to the lower caste. <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication. com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({  google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",  enable_page_level_ads: true }); Punishing  Eklavya who excelled in archery for cheating , by cutting off his thumb by Dronacharya as his guru dakshina. It is to teach us to do not to do plagiarism/cheat in our studies/knowledge gaining.  It is the same as a Ph.D. holder stripped off his title once found  out to be plagiarised his work! Dronacharya decline to accept Ekalavya as his student for many reasons. Not caste. The reasons for Ekalavya was denied by Dronacharya. 1. It is not because of caste, Ekalavya was Krishna's cousin brother . Ekalavya's father, Devashrava, is Vasudeva&#

There is God.  That is Brahman. Tell your children. <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication. com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({  google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",  enable_page_level_ads: true }); Hindus (Sanatan dharmic, Vedanthist, Sidhantist, Shanmathas), will never utter the word ‘there is NO God’, because vak (word/shahadah) is one of the important tools of mind to decide one's destiny of reaching God. Hindus will never ever say it because when one uttered the word by heart,  it is in a way he/she is emptying the soul from being occupied by God. The moment one utter that,  there will be a void in the soul.  Once void, It can be occupied by any other entities OTHER than God. (such as spirits, ghost, etc.) Therefore,  Hindus ALWAYS say,  There is God, that is God. There is God, that is Brahman. There is Brahman, that is Brahman. There i

Sati : Saved Dignity of Hindu Women (Malay version below) <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication. com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({  google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",  enable_page_level_ads: true }); Cruel? Sati ritual is often seen and demeaned as cruel and  Hinduism  as a cruel religion to women by the anti Hindu and conversion agents. But the actual  incidents happen for different issues and to  protect the dignity of Hindu women from the barbarians from the desert. Lila of Sakti Peetam (Pithas/ Temples) Sati (self immolation) was first done by Mahadewi Sakti when his father Daksha insulted her husband ( Shiva), Sati was very angry and went into the yagna fire. Remember, Yagna is the doorway to next world of Gods. She went in doesn't mean she is suiciding. The purpose is to form Sakti Pithams to create more of temples (about 51