Skip to main content

33 Crore of Hindu Gods?

Brahman One, Manifestation Many
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.



com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});


33 Crore of Hindu Gods? No, that is an absolute blunder by some Hindus and non-Hindus. But it is ok, still can be absorbed into the truth of Brahman. Hindus don't follow by the book. We don't exclusive our selves into a particular set of rules.


Brahman (Brahm)  is one in formless form. Brahman also exists in form. Forms are the manifestation of Brahman, which can be many. The concept of ekan anekan, clearly shows one Brahman can manifest into everything.

33 Supreme Deities were mistranslated into 330 million Gods.
The real term is ‘Trayastrinsat koti’, it refers to 33 types of Deities in Hinduism,  mentioned as below, 12 Adityas or Solar Devas including Indra, Surya, Mitra, and Varuna, 11 Rudras, the Manifestations of Lord Shiva, 8 Vasus or Elemental Devas such as Vayu, Agni, Antariksha and Dyaus, the Sky Deva and 2 Ashwini Kumaras. These 33 Devatas are supporting Brahman to sustain the universe. They are not GODS. Devatas also can be referred to angels as helping God in Abrahamic religion.

Koti in Sanskrit means type or supreme, important, etc. So there is only 33 type of devatas. They are explained in Shatapatha Brahman and many other scriptures very clearly.

"Yasya Trayastrinshad Devaa Ange Sarve Samaahitaa, Skamma Tam Bruhi Katamah Swideva Sah”. ~(Atharva Veda 10-7-13)

Translation- with God’s influence, this thirty-three (supporting Devata) sustains the world.

These are referring to  33 attributes of God, the important deities (devas), assisting God. For example, on Mahameru chakra, resides all of them.

Hindu Scriptures
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, chapter 3, the conversation between a sage named Yajnavalkya and  Sakalya on Brahmam which can be expounded to 33 primary manifestations and are called Devas/Gods.

Yajnavalkya says "The thirty-three gods are eight Vasus, eleven Rudras, twelve Adityas – they make thirty-one (ekatrimsat) – then Indra and Prajapati – these make thirty-three gods."

33 divinities are mentioned in the Yajur-veda, Atharva-veda, Satapatha-brahmana, and in several other Vedic and later texts.
Atharva Veda
Book 10, Hymn 7, Verse 13

“yasya trayastrimsad deva ange sarve samaahitah | skambham tam bruhi katamah svid eva sah ||”
In whose one limb all the Gods, three and thirty in number, are affixed, tell me of that Support, who may He be?
“Who out of many, tell me, is that Skambha He in whose body is contained all three-and-thirty Deities?”

Atharva Veda
Book 10, Hymn 7, Verse 22

“yatradityaas ca rudras ca vasavas ca samaahítah | bhutam ca yatra bhavyam ca sarve lokaah prátiṣṭhitāḥ skambháṃ táṃ brūhi katamáḥ svid evá sáḥ ||”

“Who out of many, tell me, is that Skambha In whom Ādityas dwell, in whom Rudras and Vasus are contained, In whom the future and the past and all the worlds are firmly set”.

In Brihadaranyaka Upanishad,
Chapter I, hymn 9, verse 1

Yajnavalkya said that there are three hundred and three and three thousand and three gods. When the question is repeated? He says, thirty-three. When the question is again repeated he says six. Finally, after several repetitions, he says ONE.


Another version.
I believe it is the ‘triyastrinsat’ misquoted into   ' 33 kothy, devas' (Sanskrit). Later were translated into Tamil it became 'mu pathy, mu kodhy, devargal' and become 33 kodhy devargal.  (33 kodhy is mistranslated into 33 crores) Through time and different scholars had changed the real meaning because of confusion on terms of Deva and God. And this became a mockery for non-Hindus.
So there are no such things as '33 crore Gods ' in Hinduism.
Even if it assumed as 33 crores, nothing wrong with it because Brahman can take any form or manifest in every being. And Hindus are not people of a particular book. Anyway, Brahman is one.

Brahm is one.

Lord Krishna explains this in the Bhagavad Gita,
I am the goal, the supporter, the Lord, the witness, the abode, the refuge, the friend, the origin, the dissolution, the foundation, the substratum, and the imperishable seed. (Chapter 9, Verse 18)

I am the origin or seed of all beings, O Arjuna. There is nothing, animate or inanimate, that can exist without Me. (Chapter 10, Verse 39)

O Arjuna, know Me to be the eternal seed of all creatures. (Chapter 7, Verse 10)

Brahman is one in Brahm (formless ), supreme light.  But can have many forms as He is omnipotent.

Om Namasivaya.
Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
2 June 2017


Reference
1. Sourced from Quora.
2. Sivaya Subramaniamswami, Dancing With Siva, Himalayan Academy.
4.Srimad Bhagavad Geeta,  Shree Geeta Ashram, Delhi Cantt. India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shiva Linga Dan Konsep Tuhan

Shiva Linga Dan Konsep Tuhan.  Dalam Konteks Hindu. Simbol /Linga (Sanskrit    लिङ्ग ) Linga ialah SIMBOL sempurna mewakili Tuhan Mahaesa (Veda-Parabrahman, Mazhab Siva- Mahesan) yang tiada rupa hanya satu. Perkataan Linga ialah ganbungan daripada perkataan LING + GA, Ling bermaksud dissolusi/ mahapralaya /kiamat, manakala Ga bermaksud penciptaan (creation), maka maksud sebenar ialah Tuhan maha berkuasa yang melakukan tugas penciptaan dan disolusi, Setiap benda datang daripadaNya dan akan kembali kepadaNya. Mahadeva Siva merupakan tonggak utama untuk mencapai Moksha (Mazhab Siva). Linga juga mewakili Trimurti utama (Rudra/ Siva, Vishnu dan Brahma). Kitab Rujukan Autoriti untuk Mazhab Siva. Rujukan utama  seharusnya daripada 4 Veda dan 28 Saiva Agama yang diturunkan sendiri oleh Mahadeva Siva, Maka sebarang klaim seharusnya daripada Veda atau Agama. Disamping ada 18 Mahapurana termasuk Siva Purana, Linga Purana dll. Namun Purana bukan autoriti rujukan dan ia lebih kepada sejarah la

Sembah Patung? Agama Apa Itu?

Sembah Patung? Ada orang ingat atau andaikan bahawa orang Hindu  sembah patung (berhala) kerana dia NAMPAK  orang Hindu sembah di hadapan patung tanpa sedar atau memahami hakikat sebenar.  Persoalan,  Saya juga LIHAT  ada orang sembah dihadapan bangunan, ADAKAH ORANG ITU SEMBAH BANGUNAN ITU? TENTUNYA TIDAK.  Kerana saya sebagai seorang Hindu ada kewarasan minda untuk memahami kebenaran TUHAN dan memahami konsep Tuhan dalam keadaan Nirguna dan Sarguna.  Tetapi ada orang yang DANGKAL ilmu ingat orang Hindu sembah batu. Perlu diingatkan disini, ORANG ITU PERNAH MENGAKU SEMBAH BATU MASA KECIL KERANA KEBODOHAN SENDIRI. MALANGNYA MASIH KEKAL BODOH walaupun mendabik sudah jadi pandai.  <script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication. com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script>  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({  google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",  enable_page_level_ads: true }); Orang Hindu sembah Tuhan dal

Arulattam/Trance and Saiva Siddhantam

 Arulattam/ Trance and Saiva Siddhantam Meaning of Trance Trance is actually when a bhakta reaches the height of Bhakti (paravasam), after went through vratham, pujas, meditations, etc., the mind is fully engrossed with the deity one prays,  the atma will be connected with the Paramporul within one’s body. The maya veil is removed for a moment, thus the sparks of the ‘projected’/believed deity/paramporul will manifest in the physical body of the person. (The deity projected is based to past karmic account actually). That is the reason one in trance will cry, yell, dance, etc because the joy of the temporary union with the deity. The ‘projected’/believed appearance is based on what deity one prays. If one projected Kaliaman, the Kaliamman will manifest, if Muneeswarar then Muneeswarar will be manifested. Most bhaktas don’t go for Murugan, Sivan or Ganapathy because it is considered difficult or seen as a higher deity. But if one really projected, these deities also will manifest (karmic